Who would win in war between Liberals and Conservatives?



  • Trump made it clear that all options are all the table for north Korea. That option is still there, the President also said when we attack we will not inform anyone, the timing and hour will be ours to make and we will not inform anyone like the past administrations.
  • Oh, so he meant fire and fury to be determined At a later date. Got it.
  • I believe that if NOKO's recent provocative missiles were aimed toward Guam, that would have been considered a threat to the US territory. It would have been shot down.
  • U.S. Collective Defense Arrangements (U.S. Dept. of State)

    A treaty signed April 4, 1949, by which the Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all; and each of them will assist the attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force.

    PARTIES: United States, Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom"

    A Treaty signed September 1, 1951, whereby each of the parties recognizes that an armed attack in the Pacific Area on any of the Parties would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional processes.

    PARTIES: United States , Australia, New Zealand

    A treaty signed August 30, 1951, by which the parties recognize that an armed attack in the Pacific Area on either of the Parties would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and each party agrees that it will act to meet the common dangers in accordance with its constitutional processes.
    PARTIES: United States, Philippines

    JAPANESE TREATY (Bilateral)
    A treaty signed January 19, 1960, whereby each party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes. The treaty replaced the security treaty signed September 8, 1951.

    PARTIES: United States, Japan"

  • @redsnapper couple weeks ago you were calling President Trump a war monger because of his " fire and fury" comment in regards to NOKO now you mad because he didn't follow through and attack NOKO for a testing a dud missile?

    If it was aimed at guam it would have been tracked and the US would have attacked NOKO and red snapper would be mad.

  • Not war monger, pussy monger. Geez, porno star, get your fake facts in order.
  • Oh look the Pussies are flocking towards him like steel to magnet.

  • Lol
  • @MrWang_Lung

    Admiral: No Evidence of Hacking in McCain, Fitzgerald Collisions
    Navy investigators have found no evidence that cyber intrusions played a part in the serious collisions of two guided-missile destroyers in the past three months, the Navy's chief of naval operations said Wednesday

    You claimed that the cause of these ship collision is due to hacking but recent investigations have found that to be false.

    How does one hack a ship that still use steering wheels?
  • Kanfanit Pawned, I'm trying to stop posting and here you are, drawing me back for more. Good for those squids, now the total blame rests on human error and the lowly seaman.

    You claimed that the cause of these ship collision is due to hacking but recent investigations have found that to be false.

    This is what I said "That's what the Navy is suspecting with their ship collisions." If we take our time to read carefully, we would avoid a lot of the nonsensical discussions we have in here.

    As the photo depicts, this is not your typical canoe you used back in the lagoons to terrorize those parrot fishes when you were out spearfishing. It's a highly computerized navigation system. The software to jam navigation systems are available today, it's just a matter of decrypting the codes.

    Just look how intense and engaged that seaman is with the panels. I can tell you that he's definitely not watching his small hands on the steering wheel or watching Duck Dynasty on a small tv in front him. Stop calling me back. LOL

  • @MrWang_Lung you are out of date on current events. But then again you are a EXmarine. Navy is responsible for ship navigation not no jarhead.

    The Navy has went back to its roots to celestial navigation in anticipation of its satellites being hacked not its ships. Lol....Navigation instruments can be hacked but the ships steering wheel. You do know the steering system is different than the navigational instruments right.

    Naval Academy teaching future sailors to use sextants amid cyberwar fears
    Students taking classes on the Naval Academy this autumn are being taught celestial navigation for the first time since 2006, and Navy officials admit the curriculum change is at least partly a response to budding fears of cyberwarfare.

    The Navy isn’t worried about space alien hackers, but rather exploits that could target any of the 31 satellites that orbit the Earth every day to make the government-run global positioning system, or GPS, accurate within inches.

  • Pawned, your are truly a parrot fish terrorist with the way you're coming back with your fuzzy logics. So now your trying to say that a steering wheel -- a mechanical apparatus -- works independently of a computerized navigation system? That's like separating the mouth from the brain, don't you think? At the same time, on your own admission, you said that the system can be hacked. I agree, that's what prompted a Navy investigation and so you know that cyber is a possibility at least.

    Let me try to link those three together - steering wheel, navigation system, and a seaman. I use a navigation app on my phone and a steering wheel with GPS enabled. The app updates me as I drive, "In 300 feet, slide left into Pawned street," "In 500 feet you will reach your destination," or "You are at your destination." That's the power of GPS feeding the app with data, me as a navigator analyzing those instructions, and turn the steering wheel accordingly. The steering wheel does not act on its own.

    Enable your GPS on your phone. Go to Google Dashboard, Timeline, and your will see every locations you ever been to for the past years nicely plotted on a google map. Same applies to Apple except for the history.

    Please inform the Navy that we in Micronesia, have a boatload of skilled celestial navigators in case they get lost out there.

    Stop calling me. (-:)
  • Conspiracy after conspiracy. Fantasy after fantasy.
  • Maybe aliens are involved. Attack from planet of the orangutan's.
  • Thats why the navy has went back to teaching its recruits celestial navigation. GPS can go down, link can be disrupted but the stars can't. Like the silos this is hack prove. Hahaha

    And welcome to pawn street where facts lives.

    Redsnapper chill this is out of your dept. You can't even do simple math. Mr. 1 in 3 equals 250,000. Lol
  • 1 in 3 is 33% and 33% of 2 million is? Common porno star I know you can do it! What is the number? Unless you only completed addition and subtraction, this would be extremely had to comprehend. Red neck backwards ass math might differ in the answer. In that case just say bigly, huge a number you won't believe.
  • Hahaha 1 in 3 equals 33%...where did you went to school?

    Here is a simple way for your simple brain.

    There are 20 Soldiers, 1 in 3 Soldiers out of 20 is a liberal. So 1 in 3 out of 20 will be 6. 6 out Soldiers out of 20 will be liberal the remaining will be 14. 3 is less than 14. But according to you 3 is greater than 14. According to you 6 liberals outnumber 14 conservatives. Haha
  • This is already worse than pre-admin.I'm loving it and despising it at the same time.
  • Love that reds been bms-ing ever since trump won and hate that reds math is worst than a 1 year old.

  • But your said for every 1 liberal there was 2 republicans in the military. So when you see 3 soldiers, one is a liberal and the other 2 is a republican.that's 1/3=.33. Wow now I know where yours and orangutan's math comes from. Trump university graduates! The level of stupid is remarkable. But you can be saved but will require immediate remediation.
  • 56% of the military is Republican leaning now add that 33% liberals in the Military equals to 1.7 million. Does not add up now since there are 2 million service members in the US military. Like i said where did you went to school. Your formula does not make sense because 57%+33% comes out 1.7 million what happened to the other 300,000?

  • It's official stupid has landed in micsem.i ask micsem admin to declare your brain a disaster area so more resources be made available to enlighten your mind and more importantly educate you. Your are experiencing the early onset of orangutanism.
  • That coming from the Mr. 1 in 3 out of 2 million is 33%....lol like i said where did you go to school at?
  • Turn to person next to you, they'll be able to explain it to you. 1 divided by 3 equals? Hope you the best in life, you'll need it.
  • Its 3 minus 1 you moron. 3-1=2. 1 in 3 is a liberal. You subtract (-) not divide (÷). 1 in 3 is liberal. So 3 take away one is 2 not 3 or 33%. Hahaha.

    @redsnapper whats 3-1?

    Mr.Orangutanazi does not approve of your education and your word solving skills.
  • Exceptional stupid. Take a bow. I gave you credit saying you might be smarter than orangutan. That's now rescinded due to extreme lack of astuteness.
  • This is coming from Mr. 3-1=3 hahaha or 3 minus 1 is 33% haha
  • Stupid is irreversible. I rest my case
  • Come on honey it was you who came up with 33% being the answer to 3-1. Hahaha
  • I'm a bit late, but I figured I'd provide some input being that there is a lot of misinformation on this thread. First, PawNStaR, the Democrats of the civil war were more conservative, the Republicans more liberal in values. They later flip-flopped.

    To address the question, in the short run, potentially Conservatives, especially given the current president.

    The army is pretty evenly split, despite outdated and inaccurate reports often cited. About 32% of army personnel lean conservative, as opposed to 23% liberal based on more randomized sampling. http://andrewgelman.com/2009/05/05/how_soldiers_re/

    Conservatives have more guns. A lot more. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/05/09/gun-ownership-used-to-be-bipartisan-not-anymore/?utm_term=.d3f68f447a1e&wpisrc=nl_politics&wpmm=1

    In the short term, conservatives. However, in the long term, liberals have the vast majority of scientists, and thus the vast majority of new weaponry or advanced technologies. http://www.people-press.org/2009/07/09/section-4-scientists-politics-and-religion/

    Liberals also have the majority of the more educated. http://www.people-press.org/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults/

    I could see liberals winning in the end, although I doubt there could be a divide large enough to cause a civil war.
Sign In or Register to comment.