Its been confirmed that the obama administration had Trump wiretapped

Now CNN is admitting that the Obama administration had secrets court orders approved to wiretap the trump campaign during the elections. Trump said he was wiretapped, the media and left in general called him a crazy liar. They said Obama would not step on the constitution to do this but as it turned out today that Trump was right all along and the media and left were wrong.

Here is CNN story on admitting trump was right.


  • Some of the liberal leaning micronesians in here commented a few months back stating that Trump is a lying POS. And they cited CNN has the reason why Trumps claims were false. Now that CNN admitting a few hours ago that the wiretaps did happened what will be their excuses be? Obama did it for the good of the country? Obama did it to protect the elections? And now we know why Trump calls CNN fake news.
  • The FBI having a wiretap on Paul Manafort since 2014 is not the same thing as Obama putting a wiretap on Donald Trump.
  • Rastaman, I thought CNN is false news according to you and Pawnstar..
  • If this is true then this is scary. Trump is in some way been vindicated. I don't believe for one bit that this begun in 2014. The FBI claim this started in 14 but a couple of months back in March of this year the FBI through its director James Comey, whom Trump fired said on live T.V and under oath that Trumps claim about his campaign team being wiretapped were baseless and untrue. Now these new reports tell us that james comey lied under oath. Also the clapper who was the head of national intelligence also denied on t.v and under oath that trumps campaign was wiretapped. Weren't both james comey who was FBI Director and james clapper who was national intelligence director were Obama appointees?

    If both lied under oath and denied trump campaign wiretaps who is to say "it started in 2014" ? Also the FBI FISA order seeking permission for wiretap was in 2016. How can FBI say wiretaps started in 2014 when the fisa order came about in 2016. It simply does not add up.
  • Really Anunaki? Is that the only way to get a wiretap warrant ...through FISA?
  • I like how SAka go straight to ask about fisa yet try to ignore the facts that both obama appointed directors denied any wiretaps into trumps campaign team. FBI is responsible for federal law enforcement within America, so how did Comey not know about the wiretaps since he is the head of the FBI and must give to "green light" to proceed? How did Clapper not know when his agency is where every intelligence informations end up? And Anunaki you are right this is some scary shit.
  • SakaSaka, in this case it is. FISA is the only way for the Obama administration to get wiretaps since it involves allegations of a foreign conspiracy.

    This is what you missed, Mr. Comey told Congress in late March that he “had no information that supports those [Trump] tweets.” Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was even more specific that “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against—the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.” He denied that any such FISA order existed.
  • Anunaki, a wiretap on the Trump Campaign or Trump himself is not the same thing as a wiretap on Paul Manafort.
  • Why would that be Richard, not the same when they're both wiretaps?
  • Wire tapped of Manafort occurred in Trump Tower--where he has office; and where Mr. Trump's campaign headquarter was located. So one wonders: if they were able to listen to Manafort, who else in the Trump Tower they were also able to listen to. Remember, it's electronic signals so it's easy to intercept; not landline.
  • Richard, wasn't Manafort Trumps campaign manager? The FBI claims the investigations on Manafort started in 2014. Yet only requested a secret FISA warrant for wiretaps when he got involved with Presidential candidate Trump in 2016. Why only in 2016 but not in 2014-2015. All these leaks in the media about Trump and Russia i will bet came from the wiretaps. Why did both the FBI and National intelligence Directors both lied under oath that no FISA or wiretaps ever happened?
  • edited September 2017
    FBI requested a secret FISA order in 2016, Justice department gave the go ahead and FBI carried it out. All these two departments of the US government were all under the Obama administration. Remember Obama said on national T.V not once but many times that Trump will never be President. Obama was banking on the wiretaps he knew the FBI placed on the Trump campaign.
  • Lol@Rasta....u guys are ridiculous
  • @SakaSaka...Thats the same thing they said when trump said he and his campaign was wiretapped by the Obama administration.
  • Its all unraveling what was hid in the dark by the previous administration is all coming into the light. Its also been revealed that in its last months in office the obama administration outed many people in the Trump administration, all the leaks concering Trump that came from unnamed sources all point to the wiretaps as the source of the leaks. Only in facist and Stalinist countries would a leaving president wiretaps the opposing partys presidential candidate
  • edited September 2017
    Oh my...image where is this all going to lead? All the leaders seem to be high on might...
  • It wasn't the Obama administration, but the FBI, doing so not for the democrat's benefit, as Trump strongly implied, but as part of the investigation into the current administration's ties to Russia. Trump himself was not wiretapped either. I'd say the title to this threat is intentionally misleading. Its been confirmed that the obama administration (correction: FBI) had Trump (correction: Paul Manafort) wiretapped.
  • edited January 2018
    "It wasn't the Obama administration, but the FBI, doing so not for the democrat's benefit, as Trump strongly implied, but as part of the investigation into the current administration's ties to Russia. Trump himself was not wiretapped either. I'd say the title to this threat is intentionally misleading. Its been confirmed that the obama administration (correction: FBI) had Trump (correction: Paul Manafort) wiretapped".

    × FBI takes it marching orders from the DOJ Who takes its from the President of the US. The president is the head of the executive branch which includes DOJ AND FBI. Chain of command from FBI to DOJ leads to Obama.

    × No evidence(s) of ties has been found. under
    No evidence(s) of link/ties between Trump/Russia found byFBI, NSA, CIA or DIA. The alphabet boys. Ergo its "alleged" ties

    × Manafort was tapped because of allegedly being the link between Trump and Russia. But as recent evidence and events have shown he has been charged financial charges alluding to years he work for Podest who was working for Hillary clinton during the Time Russia took/invaded eastern Ukraine. The russian investigations shows us clinton/democrats&russian collusion.

  • Oy vey. That's a very simplistic understanding of the US government. This may help you gain a better understanding:

    But I know everything is "liberal bias" to you, so there may be no educating you.

    No connection to Russia? Now you're trolling.

    I'm not getting into another debate with you. My rib cage can only take so much laughing, and my brain cells only so much incoherent babble from you Pornstar, er, ahem, Pawnstar. You got the pawn part right I suppose.
  • edited January 2018
    I work for the federal government Jimmy, the agency i work for falls under DOJ jurisdiction and our chain of command goes to Attorney General Session who take his orders from the POTUS. My agency like FBI are under federal executive branch which is headed by the POTUS. Who's job is to enforce the law.

    × No connections or evidences of connection have been found between Trump/Russia.

    Top democrats on both senate intelligence committee have said again and again thay they've seen no evidences of Trump/Russia collusion.

    Here are some of those high ranking Democrat senators admitting this on T.V

    Press image to play video

    Press image to play video

    Press image to play video

    Feinstein is one of these senators and a member of the big five. These are the top top senators who receive intels and briefs from CIA and FBI and DIA and NSA. They were told from the get go that no evidence linking trump to russia has ever been found. But the democrats on the big five went on t.v and say otherwise. All in the name of the resistance.

    Video number 2 should be interesting since its the head of the NSA/National security agency. The most well funded intel agency in the US.
  • For once you are smart. Stay out of politics debate because micsem is littered with the corpse of liberals who've tried and have failed. Stick to fairy tale debates like climate change.
  • You work for the Justice Department? Oh, that's rich. Last time I checked the Justice Department doesn't tend to hire people incapable of capitalizing their "I"s. If the FBI reported to the president, it seems awfully odd they're currently investigating him despite his apparent attempts to sabotage it.

    Like I said, I'm not engaging in another debate. Hell, you're the bloke that continually cites articles which disprove your position. What did you do it, 10 or so times on the other conversation? I'm wasting my time on someone who half the time disproves himself. Do you even need me?
  • Like citing cmi to disprove of the flood? Hahaha

    Yes they are investigating alleged connections and still no evidence have been brought to prove collusion. Your leaders in the democrat party admits this. If he'd have sabotaged it he would have been impeached already. Be happy trump is the POTUS because if he is gone you'll have Pence who is more a hawk and far more conservative than trump on immigration and foriegn policy. Trump is a light weight conservative compared to pence his VP.
  • Like citing a link that says the flood is a myth to prove the flood isn't a myth.
  • Lol..PS still around. Same ol brainwashed self...or soul.
  • Two house committees are investigating this as we speak. Thats all i can say regarding this matter.

    Again Nefarious shows how he hates scientific facts. But then again all anti Christian liberals are the same.

    Ha sakaska still enjoying those welfare programs i see. Haha
  • Mr. "Pro-science" hasn't cited a single study despite being asked over two dozens. Not. Even. One.
  • Very interesting post. Thanks. image 
  • @SeeminglyNefarious

    Search google for peer reviews that disagree with climate change. Its there now go and find look em up. There are more of them than pro climate change peer reviews.

    Get over it Already your religion is fake.
  • @PawnStar

    List your peer reviews, PLEASE! :-)

    How much do you charge to entertain parties?
Sign In or Register to comment.