Obstruction Of Justice Narrative Destroyed: Deputy Attorney General Recommended Comeys Firing

SUMMARY FROM VARIOUS NEWS ARTICLES

There has been too much speculation from the left wing liberal controlled mainstream media that Trump instructed justice when he fired James Comey. And these speculations have put forth many fake comments in here that Mueller is investigating Trump for obstruction of justice.

The Deputy Attorney General of the US wrote a memo which recommended the firing of James Comey. This memo let to his firing by Trump. Why? Because according to the memo written by the same man who named Mueller to lead the investigations, Comey overstepped his authority in the Clinton email investigations.

According to that same memo, its the FBIs jobs to investigate, not to recommend if charges will be pursued or not. Its the DOJ JOBS to pursue charges not the FBI. ACCORDING TO THE SAME MEMO WRITTEN BY THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.

Say goodbye to the speculations and mainstream media fake news.
«13

Comments

  • DOJ watchdog finds James Comey defied authority as FBI director, sources say
    By Mike Levine
    Jun 6, 2018, 10:28 AM ET


    The Justice Department's internal watchdog has concluded that James Comey defied authority at times during his tenure as FBI director, according to sources familiar with a draft report on the matter.

    One source told ABC News that the draft report explicitly used the word "insubordinate" to describe Comey's behavior. Another source agreed with that characterization but could not confirm the use of the term.


    In the draft report, Inspector General Michael Horowitz also rebuked former Attorney General Loretta Lynch for her handling of the federal investigation into Hillary Clinton's personal email server, the sources said.

    But in backing Trump's ultimate decision to fire Comey last year, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein slammed Comey's letter to Congress and said it "was wrong" for Comey "to usurp the Attorney General's authority" when he announced in July 2016 that the FBI would not be filing charges against Clinton or her aides.

    "It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement," Rosenstein said in a letter to Trump recommending Comey be fired. "At most, the Director should have said the FBI had completed its investigation and presented its findings to federal prosecutors."
    https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/doj-watchdog-finds-comey-defied-authority-fbi-director/story?id=55670834

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/09/us/politics/comey-fbi-memo-rod-rosenstein.amp.html

  • @redsnapper and @Visafree , what are your thoughts on this?
  • The Times article is 13 months old - old news. The other regards a report which has yet to be released, and provides nothing new. So what is your point, exactly?
  • Reaper, it is ture that old news.. try something newer and it will be very interesting..my take..
  • edited June 7
    Reaper, Where you got your info. from, your momma? No wonder, there kind of off, stop boning your own mother gee, you need help man.
  • @SaremChuuk, June 6, 2018 was Yesterday! Not 13 months ago.

    By Mike Levine
    Jun 6, 2018, 10:28 AM ET


    "It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement," Rosenstein said in a letter to Trump recommending Comey be fired. "At most, the Director should have said the FBI had completed its investigation and presented its findings to federal prosecutors."
    https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/doj-watchdog-finds-comey-defied-authority-fbi-director/story?id=55670834
  • @Visafree, its old news but you claimed 3 days ago that there are 2 investigations going on. Someone didn't get the memo. The Deputy Attorney General wrote a memo recommending James Comey to be fired. Yet you are under the false impression that Comeys firing is now under investigations.
  • @Nipwus, again is that how they get down in Chuuk?
  • How dare you take away their hopes and dream Reaper? Even if its false hope how dare you. They need something to keep them going even if it's false hope. I'm very disappointed in you Reaper, very disappointed. Snowflakes lifes matters.
  • Reaper: Apparently you read as well as you think. I never said the Levine article was 13 months old. I said the NY Times article discussing the memo written by Deputy AG Rosenstein was 13 months old. The article written by Levine quotes from the Rosenstein memo, which was published when Comey was fired, 13 months ago.

    It is easy for an ignorant fool to claim that there is no investigation into obstruction of justice by simply dismissing the statement Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf made to Lester Holt two or three days after Comey was fired, wherein Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf stated that he was thinking about the Russia investigation when he decided to fire Comey.

    In fact (I know you Nazis prefer fiction and propaganda rather than fact), the Special Counsel is investigating the conspiracy against the United States by Russia and the links between the Drumpf campaign and Russia in furtherance of that conspiracy, and is also investigating numerous instances of obstruction of justice, including Comey's firing.

    Levine was writing about the imminent release of the DOJ Inspector General report on the Clinton investigation. Per Levine, that report will be highly critical of Comey's handling of the Clinton email investigation. Many would agree with that assessment, but Rosenstein's memo does not form the basis for Comey's firing. Herr Drumpf said so himself, to Lester Holt.

    Ignorant fools. Reaper and PornStar. Patience would suit you both well. It will be much harder to explain in here how you could be so stupid and ignorant after the Special Counsel report on Obstruction of Justice is released in the next sixty days or so.
  • Stormy reply coming soon from pornstar. Look out Sarem.
  • I'm trembling in my boots, rs! I guess I should really be afraid! Should I apologize and seek forgiveness from the Nazis?
  • Sorry Sarem but you watch too much CNN. There is but one mandate and that is investigating if there is any collusion between Trumps campaign and Russia. Thats it. Rosenstein memo recommends firing of Comey. That same memo back up Trump on his firing of Comey. You see fire where there is no smoke.

    That same Nazi recognized Jerusalem has the jews/Israels capital. The Jews in Israel in fact love Trump.

    1.Poll: Jewish Israelis Love Trump
    https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/05/14/israel-trump-embassy-jerusalem-poll-218368

    2. JPOST POLL: SKYROCKETING SUPPORT FOR TRUMP AMONG ISRAELIS

    https://m.jpost.com/Israel-News/Skyrocketing-support-for-Trump-among-Israelis-518096

    image

    He/Trump is doing a bad job at being a Nazi.
  • Agree with the us DemocRAts or you're a racist, bigot, homophobic, nazi. That's how the democRAT brain works. The more they keep calling you these names the more it falls on deaf hears. No one is buying that race baiting politic bullsh*t anymore but themselves. The best customer for this kinda nonsense is democRATs themselves. Majority of Americans have rejected them because they see them for what they are. They like to call others Nazis but its their party that is trying to implement the same policies Hitler and the Nazis did.
  • Sarem would rather believe Comey was wrongly fired. Sorry but CNN is entertainment news. The memo from The DAG-DOJ reccomened the firing of James Comey. There is no investigations on obstruction of justice. If there was one there would be another SPECIAL counse with a different mandate to investigate it. There is only one SPECIAL COUNSEL and his name is Robert Mueller, his mandate is the Russian hoax collusion theory. Nothing else. And i would also like to remind you that Trump is not being investigated by Mueller.
  • Boy, you Nazis really have a bad case of verbal diarrhea! You are constantly moving your vowels but only loose, runny shit comes out! I guess we will just have to wait for the Special Counsel reports. Yes, reports. A report on obstruction of justice, which will most likely be released by August 1, and another report, and multiple additional indictments, on conspiracy with the Russians to rig the US election in favor of the Nazi-in-Chief, Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf.

    In the meantime, Papadopolos has flipped, and his wife is begging Trump for a pardon. Flynn has flipped. Gates has flipped. George Nader was granted full immunity in return for his full cooperation, and has apparently implicated the Qataris and an Israeli data firm in the conspiracy. Cambridge Analytica is bankrupt and its officers will probably be prosecuted by both the British and the Special Counsel. Robert Mercer and his homely daughter have fallen off the radar. The Ukrainian "Taxi King" has plead guilty and is cooperating with the New York State and Federal authorities against Cohen. Cohen will flip. Manafort will never see the outside of a jail cell and will die in jail. And Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf has lost his architect, who wet his pants when a reporter from CNBC called him, and shut down his architecture firm within a week of that call.

    WTF are "deaf hears" anyway?

    And what makes anyone stupid enough to think that Mueller is not investigating Herr Drumpf? Because he is a "subject" and not a "target"? I guess if a Nazi says it, it must be so.
  • Your are a Nazi if you don't agree with us. At one time democRATs loved TRUMP. Kissed his ass, overlook his flaws, didn't mind him sleeping around. All because he was one of them. But when he switched party that is when they became aware of his deeds.

    Now they hate him because he has went GOP.

    Cambridge analytica is a big nothing news. Obama did the same thing. Haha.

    *Flynn is charged with lying to federal prosecutor about a meeting. He will serve 3 years tops. Thats it.

    *Manafort is being charged with things he did 10 years ago. Another big nothing news.

    And again Trump is not under investigations, both DOJ and house select committee said this.

    Big nothing burgers. Trump will win 2020. He is already raising funds for his reelection campaign. What does that tell you.

    Haha
  • For a second there i thought i was reading from a teleprompter from CNN but it then realized it was sarem chuuk spewing nonsense again from watching CNN like she always does. Between her and her friend red snapper i don't know who's screws are more loose. Thank god for micsem, its where they go and vent their anger.
  • @SaremChuuk, so the 63,000,000 Russians voted in 2016? Haha. The electoral college picked Trump not the Russians. But according to you the Russians did. 2,626 counties were infiltrated by the Russians according to you and CNN. You know how stupid that sound. And just a reminder Trump won fair square. You libs overestimated him. Your candidate ran a bad campaign and she ignored those fly over states. Lets nor forget the big factor that lead to Hillary's down fall was when James Comey announced the FBI was opening a investigations on her.


    The Final electoral count of 2016. Trump is your President.
    image
  • that’s one large red pussy grabbed.
  • Yes it is. He grapped the entire continental US by a bush load. Kicking the illegal dishwashers out and got Mexico to pay for that beautiful beautiful wall. Hahaa
  • Pornstar is as big a liar as Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf. Do you have proof, Pawnzy, that Mexico will pay for a wall, or that, in fact, any wall will be built? Of course not, except in that empty space you call a mind.

    Want to bet whether Manafort goes directly from Court to jail next Friday? For crimes committed after February 18, 2018?

    You never heard me say once that any Russians voted in the 2016 general election. In fact, you never heard anyone, including CNN or MSNBC or indeed FOX news, say that any Russians voted in that election. But the Russians really brainwashed you and Reaper. You two girls really fell for the lies and disinformation spread by the Russian propaganda machine. Go ahead, go to Facebook and find out how many Russian lies you viewed in the three months leading up to the election. Facebook has the ability to tell you that.

    And the DOJ did in fact say that Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf was a subject of the Special Counsel's investigations into conspiracy to defraud the US and obstruction of justice. The House Intelligence Committee found nothing, because they did not look for anything. Want to bet on whether the Special Counsel brings perjury charges against Herr Drumpf Jr. and Erik Prince? How much do you want to bet?

    But you go ahead, you two girls, and whine and lie and bullshit your way all the way to the Special Counsel report on obstruction of justice which should be delivered to Rosenstein within the next 45 days or so.

    What will you do if you both are proven wrong? Lie about the "deep state?"
  • @SaremChuuk, Manafort is being charged with embezzlement and tax fraud. Not collusion. The embezzlement and tax fraud and related to Ukraine. During the time he committed these things he worked for the podesta group who were retained by Obamas Secretary of Sate, Hillary Clinton.

    Funny isn't it? The investigation of manafort led us back to the democRAT party. Haha

    The house intel committee has the power to go over secret documents and look into what the CIA and FBI and DIA and NSA have on this matter. Over thousands of papers and hundred of hours the house intel took to review the intelligence related to this issue and guess what the house intel found no evidences of collusion.

    And the house select committee another committee in the house released a statement saying Trump is not under investigations the special counsel.

    Haha
  • @SaremChuuk,

    Rosenstein told Trump he is not a target of Mueller's Russia investigation
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/04/19/president-trump-backs-off-rod-rosenstein-robert-mueller.html

    Oh but keep repeating what CNN tells you. The same CNN that backed Clinton during the elections of 2016. The same CNN that colluded with the Obama administration to start the Russian Bullshit story based on the dossier that was paid for by thr DNC and the Clinton campaign.

    Haha
  • You can't read any better than Reaper. And you are just as stupid. Small mind, tiny hands, tiny dick.

    I never said Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf was a target of any investigation. But apparently you missed the FOX [FAKE] News broadcast where they explained the difference between a "subject" and a "target" of an FBI or DOJ investigation. Let me explain, although I do realize Pawnzy that you might not understand the explanation.

    There are three levels of involvement in an investigation. First, a witness - somebody who only knows relevant facts but does not rise to the level of subject or target. Steele is a witness, Rosenstein may be a witness, Comey is a witness, McCabe is a witness. Oh, and in case you think you caught me, I am aware that both Comey and McCabe are part of the investigation by the DOJ Inspector General into the Hillary Clinton email investigation, and may become subjects or targets of criminal investigations. Neither has been publicly listed as either a subject or a target at this time, however.

    Second, a subject - someone who is being investigated, but does not rise to the level of a target. Subjects and witnesses are often asked to testify before a grand jury. A subject may not be indicted for a crime, but may have had or is believed to have had some level of participation in a criminal enterprise. An un-indicted co-conspirator would be a subject but not a target.

    Finally, a target, someone being investigated for the actual commission of a crime whom the investigator plans to indict and charge with the crime. Manafort is a target. Flynn, Papadopolos, and Rick Gates are all targets, only one of whom has yet to plead guilty.

    As I said, you may have missed the FOX [FAKE] News broadcast where they pointed out that Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf was categorized as a subject of both the obstruction and Russia investigations.

    OBTW, just because someone is categorized as a subject does not mean that they cannot become a target. If the investigation reveals facts which establish criminal culpability by the subject, the investigators can make the subject a target. Simple. Easy peazy, huh Pawnzie?

    And there may be a reason why Der Fuhrer is not YET a target. If Rosenstein has firmly decided that a sitting president cannot be indicted or tried while in office (DOJ guidelines so indicate), then such a sitting president could not become a target. If he can't be indicted, then he cannot become a target. He remains a "subject" of the investigation.

    So the only thing anyone can say for sure is that Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf was not at the time of Rosenstein's declaration a target of any investigation. But he sure as shit is a subject of two criminal investigations and one counter-intelligence investigation.

    Oh, and BTW again, Manafort has been indicted by a third superseding indictment charging him with both obstruction of justice and witness tampering. This happened on Tuesday, June 6, 2018. The facts which gave rise to both charges arose after February 18, 2018. If you paid better attention you would not appear to be so stupid. WADF.
  • @SaremChuuk, there you go reaping the same thing CNN has been repeating for the last 2 years. I will take Rosenstein words over yours. And he said he=Trump is not the subject/target of the investigations. All you have are maybes.

    And by the way tarrifs were slapped on Mexico. And through those tarrifs mexico will pay for that beautiful wall. 40% tarrifs he slapped them with. 25 on steel and 15 on aluminum. Just 20% tarrifs is enough to oay for the wall 10 times over. MAGA!.

    Special Report: New border wall going up in San Diego
  • Jesus, Pansy, how can you lie with a straight face. I will give you $100 if you can provide any statement attributed to any DOJ official stating that Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf is neither a subject nor a target of any investigation. Look long and hard. You won't find any such statement made by any official of the DOJ, let alone Rosenstein or your Atomwaffen leader Sessions. Did you have to go to college to become such a bullshitter, or did it come naturally?

    Glad you obtained your doctorate in US government, Panties. Unfortunately there is a long way between tariffs and an appropriation for a border wall. Or do you think that the dictator Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf can just take the tariffs himself and hire the contractors and build a border wall. BTW, it is 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum. And according to your math, Mexico will pay $250 billion in tariffs. You flunk. Grade of F. As in F**king stupid!
  • According to the National Review (and all other publications) Mueller told Der Fuhrer Herr Drumpf in March that he was a subject of the investigation. That was two full months ago. He could be a target by now.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/mueller-downgrades-trumps-role-in-the-russia-collusion-investigation/
  • *House Intel Committee ends its probe, says 'no evidence' of Trump-Russia collusion
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/russia_report_findings_and_recommendations.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwisj4S7osvbAhXCt1MKHT6yB2AQFjACegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw3lCCGTQinG4fMe6Pj06WOn

    *Senate intelligence committee probe finds no Trump-Russia collusion
    "A probe by the US House of Representatives Intelligence Committee has found no evidence of collusion between President Donald Trump's campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election".
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/04/intelligence-committee-probe-finds-trump-russia-collusion-180427155912593.html

    *House Intelligence Committee finds no collusion by Trump campaign with Russia
    http://www.jurist.org/paperchase/2018/04/house-intelligence-committee-finds-no-collusion-by-trump-campaign-with-russia.php
Sign In or Register to comment.