Supreme Court gives Trump another VICTORY
Yesterday the SCOTUS or Supreme Court Of The United States gave President Trump another victory by allowing the "broad" travel ban on immigrants coming from countries that post security risks to the United States. The Supreme court has reverse a decision that was made by a federal judge in Hawaii the 9th Circuit court.
Next month the SCOTUS will take take this case and decide if the President is right or wrong.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/12/supreme-court-allows-trump-continue-ban-most-refug/
Next month the SCOTUS will take take this case and decide if the President is right or wrong.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/12/supreme-court-allows-trump-continue-ban-most-refug/
Comments
Having said that, let me share just my own opinion. I have read the opinion and I would have to respectfully disagree that the Supreme Court's decision gave the Trump Administration victory. In fact, the decision only granted the government's stay application in part and narrowed the injunction entered by the 9th Circuit to be applicable to parties similarly situated to the Respondents. (see decision). This means that parts of the Executive Order may not be enforced against foreign nationals who have a "bonafide relationship" with a person or entity in the U.S. (see decision).
This, to me, doesn't not mean a complete victory for Trump's Administration. It means the Second Executive Order (revision of first order), although much more lenient than the first, still have flaws (I know, nothing is ever perfect), at least as far as the constitution is concerned (see opinion on constitutional issue, specifically the procedural history section of the opinion).
That will be it for now. Please see the Court's decision below, as well as some comments by experts regarding the decision.
Tirow pwan Kinisou Chapur,
Respectfully, Loyalty
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-1436_l6hc.pdf
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/what-the-supreme-courts-travel-ban-ruling-means/2017/06/26/5e86e1cc-5a7e-11e7-9fc6-c7ef4bc58d13_story.html?utm_term=.a997a3a8945e
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/06/26/supreme-court-travel-ban-ruling-what-means/428219001/
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/us/politics/supreme-court-trump-travel-ban-case.html
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/19/politics/supreme-court-travel-ban-grandparents/index.html
Thank you,
Respectfully,
Loyalty
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/12/politics/travel-ban-supreme-court-refugees/index.html
Thank you Rastaman
First, If you actually took the time reading the opinion, you'll realize that yes it's two separate lawsuits (one on EO1 and the other on EO2) consolidated by the Supreme Court. So I do not see it as two victories to start off with. This is the first time both Orders are ever reviewed by the Supreme Court.
Second, the Respondents (I do not want to label them as liberals because that has nothing to do with the parties involved) are actually victorious because they fall under the protected group under the injunction pertaining to Section 2 of the EO. The Court kept the injunction in place as to foreign nationals that are "similarly situated as the Respondents." This means that the injunction is upheld and EO2 cannot be enforced against such individuals that fall under that category.
Third, even as to parts of the injunction where the Court actually acted upon, it only "stayed" those parts. That means that it is only temporarily stopping it. This means that EO2 can be enforced against would-be immigrants and visitors who do not fall under the same privilege as the Respondents.
Respectfully,
Loyalty
Respectfully,
Loyalty
The EO will be fully enforced. The SCOTUS will rule on favor of the government.
Thank you.
This is a victory liberals don't see it that way but the federal government and conservatives do. One of Trumps lawyer predicted this outcome. In the end he said it will be a victory for the government.
Yep, it's a no-brainer. Loyalty gets 100 points for the clarification. tango tango 1= zero.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzz...
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/26/supreme-court-travel-ban-ruling-a-huge-win-for-trump-commentary.html
*The Supreme Court handed President Trump a near-total victory Monday.
*No one on the court agreed enough with the more liberal lower courts' decision to keep blocking the Trump ban.
Don't let the qualified headlines or lead paragraphs in most of the news media fool you. Monday's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court allowing just about all of President Donald Trump's travel and immigration ban to go into effect is a very significant victory for his administration.
Coming at the same time as the Russian collusion hysteria starting to wilt under Democrat self-doubt, and the crushing special election loss for Democrat Jon Ossoff in Georgia, maybe everyone really is getting tired of all of Trump's winning.
But while many Americans are still very angered by the ban, the whole country should celebrate the important victory this is for our constitutional separation of powers.
Its a near total victory! The total will come after this October after the SCOTUS pass judgement on the goverment side (Trump) citing 212 (f) INA of 1953. Obama also used this act/212(f) when he ban the same countries from sending its immigrants to the US.